Recent Protests and the Hypocrisy of the Left


Those of us old enough to recall the protests, and protests turned riots of the late 60’s recognize some similarities between then and now, and some concerning differences.

Truth is, most of these protesters don’t understand or don’t even know what they are protesting, blindly rallying behind causes they fail to realize most of today’s protests are based on lies, and started by liars, just like the “Free Speech” movement which began at Berkeley in the 60’s by one Mario Savio.

Mario Savio, the political activist, who became famous for his attack on the way Universities were operated. Savio thought universities had no right to curriculums, and students should be allowed to do, or study whatever they wanted to, simply because they were students.

Savio, obviously, an intelligent man, maybe winding up at Berkley probably about the time he realized his bouncing from campus to campus failed to give purpose to his life. Mario Savio gathered a number of shallow, disillusioned, like-minded followers and with a little help from television, the Free Speech movement was born.

Savio was a fake, and his cause was based on a lie. The famed sit-ins, known as the “Free Speech” movement had little, if anything to do with free speech. At its core, the free speech movement was little more than an excuse used by its participants for refusing to take responsibility for their own lives.

The movement went from sit-ins, to protests, and finally climaxed with the deaths of 4 protesters on the Kent State campus.

Just like Black Lives Matter, founded by a liar in one Shaun King, a white guy masquerading as a black man, and the entire movement is predicated on the lie of ‘Hands Up Don’t Shoot,’ fostered and publicized by the progressive news media.

The lie has been told so often, and so many times, people think it’s the truth. Todays protests that have nothing to do with truth, they are just anger based on lies, expressed in catch phrases uttered by unhappy and untaught people, who cannot accept the truth.

The Women’s march is another example of a protest based on a false premise.

A group of women dressed up in vagina costumes claiming they are being denied freedom of choice. Are they? What choice are they being denied?

They say they want the government out of their vaginas, but they continue to invite them in. What they really want, and won’t publicly admit, is for the government to pay for their abortions and their birth control claiming it’s healthcare.

Birth control is not healthcare, and if you want the government out of your vagina, then pay for your own birth control and your own abortion.  Free birth control products can be obtained at any county health clinic for those who can’t afford them, just as they were before the Affordable Care Act.

If you are too stupid or too lazy to use birth control, what right do you have to demand the government, i.e. the taxpayer, to pay for your abortion?

The lie of the women’s march is exposed; It’s not about women’s rights, it’s about subsidizing their sex life.

The free speech movement can be traced to a disgruntled student, fueled by the media, who’s growth was attributed to gutless compromising by the leadership at Berkley.

Today’s protests are being instigated by politicians, public calls from United States Congressmen and Senators to “go and protest,” and the growth of these protests is fueled directly by a biased media.

What ever happened to ‘call you Senator’ or ‘write your congressman?

What an utter disgrace to civil democracy.

But as all things evolve so these protests have evolved, and as they continue to evolve, they become more radical, more unruly, more lawless, and are putting some very costly future results in motion.

These protests have evolved into mobs having shed any semblance of decency, while taking perversion to a whole new level. So even calling for the murder of law enforcement personnel, which is nothing short of anarchy.

The most dangerous and disturbing difference in today’s protests verses the 60’s and 70’s is the active participation of elected officials.

The hypocrisy of the ‘tolerant’ left is on display in all its deviant glory, illustrating a stark contrast between the public statements of past political leaders “we are a nation of laws,” and today’s “go and protest.”

Elected officials have chosen an ignorant and dangerous thing to do – invoking mob rule. They have opened Pandora’s box unleashing a spirit of blind hatred which will culminate in people dying because of it.

Chuck Schumer has become the Mario Savio of 2017, along with his socialist side-kick Bernie Sanders. They instigated protests against the repeal of Obamacare, by feeding lies to a mob.

Schumer, in his joint statement, calling for rallies and protests, we find:

“The Republican Party’s plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act is in chaos,” Schumer and Sanders said in the letter. “The American people increasingly understand that throwing 20 million people off health insurance, privatizing Medicare, raising prescription drug costs for seniors and doing away with life-and-death patient protection provisions is not acceptable. The overwhelming majority of Americans want to improve the ACA, not destroy it,”

Only thing is not one thing in this statement is true! Not one!

Two elected officials, instead of legislation and working with other members of Congress to reach a solution, have chosen to call for protests.

(a)Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including, but not limited to, the mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, with intent—

(1) to incite a riot; or

(2) to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot; or

(3) to commit any act of violence in furtherance of a riot; or

(4) to aid or abet any person in inciting or participating in or carrying on a riot or committing any act of violence in furtherance of a riot;

Based on their actions, Schumer and Sander’s could and  should be charged with riot incitement, and if convicted, removed from office. Before claiming they are protected under “free speech” as their predecessor Mario Savio claimed, you may be mistaken.

Consider a couple of quotes from the ACLU regarding free speech:

“Is all speech protected?

The First Amendment protects your right to express your opinion, even if it’s unpopular. You may criticize the President, the Congress, or the chief of police without fear of retaliation. But this right doesn’t extend to libel, slander, obscenity, “true threats,” or speech that incites imminent violence or law-breaking.

Can I talk about government overthrow or taking over the streets?

he government can’t stop you from talking generally about ideas or future events. But it may ban speech that’s “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”

Sanders’ and Schumer’s part in provoking protests, turning into riots should be under investigation. Instead of being leaders, and handling things in a civilized manor, on the floor of the Senate, they are encouraging mob rule. Invoking lawlessness, which will evolve into more lawlessness until deadly force is required.

Schumer in his eagerness to ‘open Pandora’s box;‘ got a taste of the consequences of his actions:

The protesters he provoked have turned on him;

When people start dying in these ‘protests,’ Sanders and Schumer will own a share in the responsibility – this is on them. There is culpability for any damage or death as a result of these protests.

It is clear, Progressives care nothing at all about everyday, hardworking middle-class Americans, who’s lives have been disrupted because other radicals wanted to join in the fun of anarchy.

The same Progressives, who for the past eight years spoke of crossing the isle –  working together – when they were in charge, have replaced those phrases with go and protest.

This is the hypocrisy of the left.




What’s Next for Hillary

What’s next for Hillary? 

The race for the presidency is over. Hillary Clinton lost. End of story, or is it?

The significance of Hillary’s loss is far greater than just the losing of an election. Behind the Hillary bid there were major machinations taking place, record amounts of money changing hands, deals being struck, and promises being made.

While there are whisperings of Hillary running again in 2020, that’s not going to happen. Hillary is done.

The groundwork is already being laid for a presidential bid by a new progressive radical in 2020. One can only speculate who that might be, the picture will become clearer once we see who is going to replace the Clintons as the next pay-for-play leader.

At the top of the list? The Obamas. Obama has world-wide personal appeal, he has already shown he is capable of major fund raising, and is extremely likeable, like most con men.

A good choice for fund-raiser-in-chief and he will be easier to manipulate than the Clintons were, a useful tool in the right hands. Ted Kennedy thought so, and he was right.

And right on Que, there is a brand new foundation just opened for business: The Obama Foundation

There will be no come back for Hillary.

What I see next for Hillary is darkly prophetic. She, or someone in her family will die under mysterious circumstances in 2017 or 2018.


Pay for play. Just like ‘living and dying by the sword’ is a truism, so is ‘living and dying by pay for play.’

Here’s an example of how pay to play works:

“The AP’s review of federal records, regulatory filings and correspondence showed that almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored Clinton’s speeches have actively sought to sway the government”

And those speaking fees amounted to $21 Million in 2 years after her leaving state dept.

In politics there have always been people like the Clintons – deal makers – initiators, which matched up individuals, corporations, or even other countries to political favors, but no one has ever been in the center of so much money for so many potential favors as the Clintons.

The loss to Trump in 2016 is the end for the Clintons as chief clearing house enablers, the money invested in the Clintons, serious money, is gone.

Every political backer (or investor) knows there is a risk of backing a losing political candidate, that’s just part of it. But with the Clintons it went far beyond the typical investing in a candidate and hoping for a positive outcome.

Major money was invested, major promises made, all bet on a supposed sure thing.

Let’s take a brief look at the kind of money we are talking about.

Remember the “we were flat broke when we left the White House” Hillary quote?

She went from broke to having a net worth of $30 million in 2015.


In 2015 is was discovered there was something fishy going on with the Clintons and their finances. Something different, money was unaccounted for. Between their income and after spending $13 mil on a 2008 run there is some $50 mil unaccounted for.

Maybe someone wanted their money back after the 2008 loss?

This is just some of the money we know about. Add in The Clinton Foundation’s $2 billion in revenue since it formed in 1998, and you begin to see the enormous amounts of money we are talking about.

But even after the 2008 loss, Bill was still very popular and Hillary could still be of some use. The Clintons could and would prove their worth during her stint as Secretary of State.

She wasn’t given that slot because of Obama, she was put there by her investors.

With that having gone well, it was time to move on to bigger and better returns on investment.

So the investment stakes were raised and the Clintons would be given one more chance to come through – the 2016 Presidential run. But it was not to be.

The money, paid to, donated to, or handed to, the Clinton’s was an “investment,” and these investors lost serious money on the Clinton bid for the presidency.

The money invested in the Clintons was not just American money, it was from foreign countries and foreign governments.

Hillary Clinton and her supporters spent a record $1.2 billion on a losing presidential campaign.

Now that Hillary has lost, she has nothing left to offer.

Millions upon millions invested, and lost. Don’t expect her backers, her investors, to just say oh well. It is reported George Soros lost $1 billion because of Hillary’s loss.

Don’t expect the Clintons to go quietly into that good night either, knowing their wealth is at risk, and that wealth could go just as quickly as it came. The Clintons will resist, and things could get ugly.

While many Americans would love to see the Clinton clan in prison, I’m afraid prison won’t be enough for these Hillary investors.

The behind the scenes puppet masters don’t like ugly, they like quiet, so attempts will be made to muzzle the Clinton push-back. If that fails, then drastic measures will be taken.

A tragic accident or an untimely demise of Hillary of a member of her family is coming.

Oddly every time the Clintons wound up in a potentially serious legal investigation, people wound up dead. No Whitehouse occupant has ever come close to the associate body count the Clintons racked up.

Here are a few of those mysterious deaths:

Who was behind these mysterious deaths? The Clintons? Or their backers?

It happens, and will happen.

My prediction: Someone in the Clinton family will meet an untimely end sometime in 2017 or 2018. The more noise they make the sooner the end will come.