Political sex-slinging in Alabama


Since Alabama has garnered national attention over the Dec 12th special election, and since Roy Moore has already been convicted in the court of public opinion, I thought as a resident of the great state of Alabama I would give you a report from inside the state.

First, let’s back up a little and follow the timeline, the players, and the plan.

Summertime 2017, its primary season.

Mo Brooks, Luther Strange and Roy Moore are battling to be the Republican nominee for the special election on Dec 12th to fill the senate seat Jeff Sessions vacated when he became attorney general.

The 3 choices:

Mo Brooks – who cares he wasn’t going to win.

Luther Strange – a good guy and probably would be pretty good senator for the people of Alabama and current temporary fill in for Sessions. But a little too establishment. You know a good ole boy.

Roy Moore – Quite a character. Radical would be an understatement. Moore is well respected in this state for his stance against Gay marriage and his fight to keep the 10 commandments in the court room, which cost him his judgeship. A major anti-swamper.

As expected Mo Brooks was blown out in the 3 way run off, then there were 2.

A runoff that should have gone to Luther Strange. And probably would have, but then came the McConnell Trump endorsement. That turned out to be the kiss of death for Luther. Not because of President Trump but because of McConnell.

Mitch McConnell is the swamp, he is hated, and I mean hated, by every conservative in Alabama.

The fact that Moore beat Strange in the run-off is proof there is a real movement behind the drain the swamp slogan. If McConnell had kept his mouth shut Luther would have won the primary. But Ole Mitch can’t help it, he is clueless. The liberals have out smarted Mitch again.  Status quo for the last 10 or 12 years. He can’t even win with a majority in both houses of Congress and Trump in the White house.

He’s a loser and we don’t take kindly to losing in this state, which is another reason Mitch is so despised by Alabamians.

So now it’s down to Radical Roy Moore and Doug Jones on the democratic side. Who the hell is Doug Jones anyway? But before we get to that here’s what happened next.

Chelsea Clinton began endorsing Doug Jones on Twitter under the #AlSen hashtag. Why? She’s not an elected official, but she is a Clinton.

Well one can only assume the liberal powers-that-be decided it was time for Chelsea to do something to earn that over a million dollar a year salary other than just being a Clinton, so she sprang into action.

My personal thoughts were; ‘butt out Chelsea, you don’t live here.’

It soon became obvious Chelsea’s endorsement was worthless, and rightfully so.

So the Lib’s needed to change tactics. They would attack Roy Moore’s background. It’s an old but effective tactic. The point of attack to use is the one that’s currently popular in the news cycle.

Guess what that is.

Since the Weinstein allegations were big news, and ‘sexually abused women’ were coming out in droves the weapon of choice was naturally allegations of sexual abuse.

The plan; use the same weapon to defeat Roy Moore. The story broke in the Washington post, and Roy Moore was convicted in the court of public opinion. All too easy.

Follow along here. First it was the Chelsea endorsement, which failed, then the Washington Post article.

Which begs the question; who fed the story to the Washington Post?

Am I defending Roy Moore? No, I don’t know if he’s guilty or not, and neither do you. But I do believe a man is innocent until proven guilty. I also know accusations are not facts. And accusations from someone about something that happened over 30 years ago are extremely suspect.

The planned attack from the democrats was instantly effective since sexual allegations were in the news cycle, Roy Moore is a man, he’s white, and he’s a republican. Guilty as accused.

Enter Gloria Allred, the pathetic legal leech whose schict is male character assassination. Dig up a female victim, or several victims, construct a biased (or BS)  story and parade this whole act through the court of public opinion, hoping to walk away with a sack full of money (where she and the victim split the cash, her percentage being higher than the victim’s because she so earned it).

Which raises another important question: who is paying for Gloria’s services? She’s not going to collect any money from her collection of clients; they don’t have the kind of money her fees call for. Even if this goes to court and she wins, it could be years before she sees a dime.

Someone is paying Gloria Allred right now, and it needs to be revealed who that is. The Democratic Party is- that is my accusation.

Who are Moore’s accusers? In in the grand scheme of things, it doesn’t matter. Not to belittle them, but once this election is over, and if Doug Jones wins, Gloria Allred and the Democrats will drop them like a hot rock and their usefulness will have ended.

The attack is working, but Roy Moore will not lay down like most politicians. He will fight to the end. During his fight over the Ten Commandments statue, he had to be physically removed from office and I doubt he has changed. Moore’s stance eventually cost him his job.

How many politicians do you know who risked their careers for their beliefs?

Back to who the hell is Doug Jones anyway? I’m not going to bash Doug Jones, he seems like a normal person. But here is a fact you should be aware of. Doug Jones was a Bill Clinton appointee.

He will be a perfect sock-puppet for the Democrats if he wins in December. The first clue of he being a sock-puppet is in his campaign ad, were he says “healthcare is broken and we need to fix it.” Really? Your party broke it, and now you innocently want to fix it?

So the stage is set. Political sex slinging at its best, and it’s worst.

What’s at stake is a Senate seat which the GOP cannot afford to lose, but it looks like they might thanks to Mitch McConnell and idiots who comprise the jury in the court of public opinion.



Thoughts of a Mad American Part 1


First in the series of thoughts of a mad American has to be:

Why haven’t you repealed Obamacare?

Hey Republican Congressmen and women. What’s the hold up, I mean besides your incompetence?

The ACA was signed into law 3/23/2010, after it was jammed down our throats without 1 single Republican Signature.  The ACA was a Kennedy wet-dream since the 80’s. If you didn’t realize Kennedy money funded Obama’s presidential campaign, then you weren’t paying attention. The  payback to Ole Ted for funding Obama was passing the ACA.

But after a Republican 7 year vow to repeal Obamacare, you have nothing to show for it except in-fighting. You can’t seem to agree on any of the parts of the bill because you have no bill.

Why can’t you get it together? Don’t you realize this single bill could destroy the United States financially? Those on the Obamacare dole are increasing daily as revealed by its growing favorable polling.

In a recent survey some 52% of Americans have a favorable view of Obamacare.

Of course they do, they are the 52% who have almost free – if not totally free healthcare through Obamacare. 85% of Obamacare enrollees receive subsidies to offset the cost of premiums as well as deductibles.

If you couple the 45% of Americans who don’t pay a dime in Federal Income Tax with those people who have pre-existing medical conditions, I’m surprised the percentage isn’t higher.

Even those persons who are on Obamacare cannot afford the out-of-pocket expense (deductible) of $3500 per year for individuals and $7400 per year per family without subsidies. So they bail out of Obamacare until they need medical care, then the just go down the next day and re-enroll, and as if by magic, they are covered.

The problem is the cost of needed government subsidies will reach $660 billion in taxpayer funds this year just to keep Obamacare afloat.

Here’s a little history review of premiums and deductibles since Obamacare became law.

The real question is why haven’t the Republicans repealed the ACA yet?

Why don’t you Republicans already have a replacement bill ready to go?

What the hell have you been doing for the last 7 years?

Maybe you could buy a “Making a plan for Dummies” book and read it in 7 years. 

You have control of the House, the Senate, and a President who is ready, even anxious, to repeal this failure before it implodes and everyone is left without coverage.

Trump was right, when he said it was time to “drain the swamp!” Maybe the ACA has not been repealed because the current Republicans are members of the swamp. Maybe they enjoy government control of 1/6th of the economy the ACA gives the swamp, the political favors it affords, the money to be had, or the votes to be gained.

Either that or they are gutless incompetents!

Why should they care – not one of them is on Obamacare – their healthcare coverage is the best available yet costs them $0.

Since you Republicans have no replacement plan after 7 years, at the very least, repeal Obamacare! You don’t need a plan for that.

Before you say you can’t – yes you can. The ACA was given the green –light by the Supreme Court based on the premise it was a tax.

Taxes can easily be repealed by a simple majority in both houses.

You think killing Obamacare is a heartless approach? No it’s not. What is heartless is  forcing working families to endure  premiums that have doubled in 8 years, to pay for someone else’s lack of health and coverage.

Why should I be forced to pay for maternity coverage when my wife and will never use it?

Why should I be forced to fund other people sex lives in the form of birth control pills, prophylactics, and abortions?

Why should I be forced to pay for healthcare of others who don’t give a damn about their own health?

Private and government safety-nets for healthcare can both exist at the same time. They did in the past.

The claim that everybody pays under Obamacare is just another lie.

There are other simpler ways of funding government sponsored healthcare where everyone truly does pay, but it seems the swamp members don’t want any part of simple or what’s best for working Americans, just what’s best for their remaining in office.

Buying votes with government giveaways.

Dear Republican swamp members repeal Obamacare!

Don’t you understand why Trump was elected over a field of career Republican politicians? Working class Americans were tired of your continual failures and excuses.

No more excuses! Repeal it or be replaced in the next election. Replaced by anyone who is in favor of calling for a Convention of States to forcefully drain the swamp.




Is Bill O’Reilly another victim?


Bill O’Reilly’s sudden departure from Fox News last week raised a few eyebrows.

Fans of the show where quick to lash out at Fox News for his dismissal, while those on the left cheered the show and Bill’s demise.

I’m not a fan of the O’Reilly Factor, nor do I dislike the show; his show just doesn’t interest me. But there is something else going on here, which happens all-to-often, an injustice.

How does one go from “the most respected news man on television” to unemployed in a matter of weeks?

It seems Bill O’Reilly is yet another victim of a judgmental society which has already made its mind up; Bill O’Reilly is not only accused of sexual harassment, but is guilty as charged. He is not the first, nor will he be the last victim of this pre-condemnation.

I do not know if he is guilty of what he has been accused of, but it is evident the public in general is already convinced he is. There is a certain stigma attached to some accusations, once leveled never seem to go away. They stick to the accused like a tattoo.

You call a person a liar, a thief, or a cheat, and the media audience takes it in stride, but:

Once a man is accused of rape, the deck automatically begins to be stacked against him. Once the public hears the accusation, they either convict him right away in their minds or become high suspicious of the individual. The same can be said for those accused of child abuse, child molestation, child pornography, or sexual harassment; they are guilty until the public’s demand for proof of innocence is met.

When the accusations are later proven to be false, most people say oh well and move on, or their suspicions never completely go away. But it’s too late for the accused, their life, is already damaged, and many times ruined for the remainder of their lives.

Anyone remember Crystal Mangum? She was the stripper who falsely accused 3 Lacrosse players of rape. The public opinion at the time: yes, 3 rich white boys raped this poor defenseless black stripper.

The campus on which this ‘rape’ took place was soon invaded by large groups of people who were convinced these three men were guilty as charged, based on nothing more than an accusation;

On March 29, more than 500 students, faculty members, administrators, and Durham residents marched across Duke—starting at the Marketplace on East Campus and ending more than a mile later at the Duke Chapel on West Campus—a “Take Back the Night” protest that was coincidentally part of a long-planned Sexual Assault Prevention Week on campus.”

The whole story was a lie, it destroyed the lives of 4 innocent college age men and their families, cost millions of dollars in legal fees proving their innocence, and the social injustice handed to them by a prejudgmental society, has not been corrected, even 10 years after the fact.

So what happened to Crystal Mangum? She’s in prison for a murder, convicted of stabbing her boyfriend to death.

What about the thousands of people who knew the Lacrosse players where guilty and said so? Did they collect money to offset the legal expenses? Did they offer apologies to Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty, Dave Evans, or Ryan McFadden? No they simply when on with their lives, leaving the lives of these 4 men in ruins.

Is Bill O’Reilly guilty of sexual harassment as charged? We do not know yet. Let me repeat that – we do not know yet. But the damage is already done. Bill is gone, and will likely never again be on television or radio, his brand permanently damaged.

O’Reilly’s fall from grace came quickly. And the story played out like it has many times in the past.

First, the accusations from Perquita Burgess and a rush to judgment media audience.

Then sponsors began pulling ad money from the show. PC (politically correct) businesses don’t want to offend anyone, in their minds they can’t afford to lose any customer, so they quickly distance themselves from any situation like the Bill O’Reilly case; which makes them as guilty of precondemnation as the general public.

Once that happened, it only reinforced the public’s condemnation of Bill O’Reilly – thinking “he must be guilty, otherwise the sponsors wouldn’t have bailed on him.”

Once the sponsor money was gone, Fox was left with no choice but to replace Bill O’Reilly. Bill O’Reilly’s fall from grace came at the hands of a former part time employee, with unproven accusations.  Perquita Burgess, armed with a high dollar civil rights attorney  who had inside access to television,  proved the fix was in for Bill.

Is Bill O’Reilly guilty of sexual harassment? All we have at this point is accusations, and lame one’s at that.

As a people who live in a country founded on law and order and the premise of ‘innocent until proven guilty,’ we owe it to Mr. O’Reilly to assume he is innocent until proven guilty. Sadly, he has become just another in a long list of innocent people, whose lives were destroyed because someone accused them of the wrong thing.

But one thing is for certain; Bill O’Reilly is a victim of a pre-condemning, Politically Correct society, and you better pray you are not next.

What’s Next for Hillary

What’s next for Hillary? 

The race for the presidency is over. Hillary Clinton lost. End of story, or is it?

The significance of Hillary’s loss is far greater than just the losing of an election. Behind the Hillary bid there were major machinations taking place, record amounts of money changing hands, deals being struck, and promises being made.

While there are whisperings of Hillary running again in 2020, that’s not going to happen. Hillary is done.

The groundwork is already being laid for a presidential bid by a new progressive radical in 2020. One can only speculate who that might be, the picture will become clearer once we see who is going to replace the Clintons as the next pay-for-play leader.

At the top of the list? The Obamas. Obama has world-wide personal appeal, he has already shown he is capable of major fund raising, and is extremely likeable, like most con men.

A good choice for fund-raiser-in-chief and he will be easier to manipulate than the Clintons were, a useful tool in the right hands. Ted Kennedy thought so, and he was right.

And right on Que, there is a brand new foundation just opened for business: The Obama Foundation

There will be no come back for Hillary.

What I see next for Hillary is darkly prophetic. She, or someone in her family will die under mysterious circumstances in 2017 or 2018.


Pay for play. Just like ‘living and dying by the sword’ is a truism, so is ‘living and dying by pay for play.’

Here’s an example of how pay to play works:

“The AP’s review of federal records, regulatory filings and correspondence showed that almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored Clinton’s speeches have actively sought to sway the government”

And those speaking fees amounted to $21 Million in 2 years after her leaving state dept.

In politics there have always been people like the Clintons – deal makers – initiators, which matched up individuals, corporations, or even other countries to political favors, but no one has ever been in the center of so much money for so many potential favors as the Clintons.

The loss to Trump in 2016 is the end for the Clintons as chief clearing house enablers, the money invested in the Clintons, serious money, is gone.

Every political backer (or investor) knows there is a risk of backing a losing political candidate, that’s just part of it. But with the Clintons it went far beyond the typical investing in a candidate and hoping for a positive outcome.

Major money was invested, major promises made, all bet on a supposed sure thing.

Let’s take a brief look at the kind of money we are talking about.

Remember the “we were flat broke when we left the White House” Hillary quote?

She went from broke to having a net worth of $30 million in 2015.


In 2015 is was discovered there was something fishy going on with the Clintons and their finances. Something different, money was unaccounted for. Between their income and after spending $13 mil on a 2008 run there is some $50 mil unaccounted for.

Maybe someone wanted their money back after the 2008 loss?

This is just some of the money we know about. Add in The Clinton Foundation’s $2 billion in revenue since it formed in 1998, and you begin to see the enormous amounts of money we are talking about.

But even after the 2008 loss, Bill was still very popular and Hillary could still be of some use. The Clintons could and would prove their worth during her stint as Secretary of State.

She wasn’t given that slot because of Obama, she was put there by her investors.

With that having gone well, it was time to move on to bigger and better returns on investment.

So the investment stakes were raised and the Clintons would be given one more chance to come through – the 2016 Presidential run. But it was not to be.

The money, paid to, donated to, or handed to, the Clinton’s was an “investment,” and these investors lost serious money on the Clinton bid for the presidency.

The money invested in the Clintons was not just American money, it was from foreign countries and foreign governments.

Hillary Clinton and her supporters spent a record $1.2 billion on a losing presidential campaign.

Now that Hillary has lost, she has nothing left to offer.

Millions upon millions invested, and lost. Don’t expect her backers, her investors, to just say oh well. It is reported George Soros lost $1 billion because of Hillary’s loss.

Don’t expect the Clintons to go quietly into that good night either, knowing their wealth is at risk, and that wealth could go just as quickly as it came. The Clintons will resist, and things could get ugly.

While many Americans would love to see the Clinton clan in prison, I’m afraid prison won’t be enough for these Hillary investors.

The behind the scenes puppet masters don’t like ugly, they like quiet, so attempts will be made to muzzle the Clinton push-back. If that fails, then drastic measures will be taken.

A tragic accident or an untimely demise of Hillary of a member of her family is coming.

Oddly every time the Clintons wound up in a potentially serious legal investigation, people wound up dead. No Whitehouse occupant has ever come close to the associate body count the Clintons racked up.

Here are a few of those mysterious deaths:

Who was behind these mysterious deaths? The Clintons? Or their backers?

It happens, and will happen.

My prediction: Someone in the Clinton family will meet an untimely end sometime in 2017 or 2018. The more noise they make the sooner the end will come.


The 2016 Presidential Election and the Electoral College

electoral-college I would like to thank an acquaintance of mine in California who was the inspiration for this article.

Historically after the winner of a presidential election was declared, the disappointment of the losing party quickly subsided. The election was over, time to accept the results, make the best of it, and move on.

This year was different. After Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton the intolerance of the left was exposed for all the world to see.

The same Liberals who preach tolerance, all lives matter, demanding the acceptance of all lifestyles and faiths, were lying in the streets crying, rioting, and refusing to accept the results.

But that discussion is for another topic.

After the election was over a long-time acquaintance of mine who lives on the left coast, questioned the legitimacy of the Electoral College on Facebook. His concerns about Donald Trump were undoubtedly shaped by what he had heard constantly by the 24 hr. a day news media which relentlessly attacked Donald Trump.

The media labeled Trump as a racist, a bigot, a homophobe, a woman hater, and a dozen other derogatory things. None of which are true, but that also is for another topic.

Returning to the Electoral College comment; my first thought ‘was welcome to the club.’ Not because I think the Electoral College should be done away with, but because so much of my life has been affected by the Electoral College in the exact opposite manor.

First things first: my friend in California’s position is Hillary won the popular vote so the Electoral College results should be voided. That we are a democracy, therefore the person with the most votes wins.

But America is a Republic which operates on democratic principles. Big difference. One of the reasons the founders decided each state would have 2 Senators was to preserve equality of representation amongst the states in the enacting of laws which would affect the entire country.

Many would have you believe the Electoral College was created to keep an incompetent from becoming president, but that’s not exactly true. The Electoral College was created to prevent nationwide mob rule by one or a handful of states.

Now let’s look at election results (as of November 12th):

Nationwide popular vote:

Trump 60,072,551

Clinton 60,467,601

A difference of 395,050. A very slim margin of victory.

Now let’s look at 2 statewide results:


Trump 3,021,095

Clinton 5,589,936

A difference of 2,568,841

New York:

Trump 2,640,570

Clinton 4,143,874

A difference of 1,503,304

Now take out the results of either state, New York or California, and Trump wins the popular vote by more than a million. Take them both out and Trump wins the popular vote in a landslide.

My California friend, in anger only I’m sure, echoed the notion of succession from the union, and he wasn’t alone. Wow! Talk about the shoe being on the other foot. Sounds just like the south prior to the Civil war.

Why would they say that? Because they feel Trump is a threat to their way of life. Just like the southern states did prior to the civil war.

It has been taught (by Liberal teachers) for decades the civil war was all about slavery, but that’s not true. It is also taught everyone in the south either had slaves, or was in favor of slavery, but that’s not true either.

Were the evils of slavery a part of it, without question, but the main issue which provoked succession, was when the Northeastern part of the country, far more densely populated, and with a huge technological advantage, began dictating to the lesser populated southern states, how things would be.

Mob rule. A situation diametrically opposed by the Electoral College.

People in the south felt their states’ rights were being violated and their way of life under assault. It was unacceptable for a couple of Northern states to dictate to them how they should live and what rights they should have.

They felt their way of life threatened, so they succeed from the union.

Now fast forward to the last 50 years, and my previous comment ‘welcome to the club’ and how the Electoral College has failed the rest of us at times.

California and New York City are the centers of television, movie production, and news media headquarters. For the last 50 years or so, Liberals have determined what movies would be made, what television shows would be aired, and what and how news stories would be told, while the rest of the country just had to deal with it.

The Liberals took full advantage of this and attacked, belittled, undermined, and at times outright attacked the way of life of Americans in the other 45 states who disagreed with their views.

The news media was used as a weapon to distort the truth and coheres the population to further the Liberal agenda.  We didn’t have a media and entertainment Electoral College, as it were, for us in the other 45 states. Our opinion didn’t matter


News flash: most of the movies coming out of Hollywood are nothing short of trash. The View is a social cesspool, Seinfeld wasn’t that funny, not every show has to have a homosexual in it, and nobody in the south liked Honey Booboo; your polling data was wrong (just like in this year’s presidential race).

Thank heavens for NetFlix and others like it.

Oh, and New York City, you are neither the cultural beacon for the country or a shining example of the American dream. Get over yourself.

And speaking of polling data; it’s easy to get the poll results you want when you get to pick the participants. No one I know, myself included, has ever been asked to participate in any political poll. Polling data was and is fixed, whose truthful representation has become a tool the news-media uses to manipulate public opinion.

For too long, the two most heavily populated states have determined the political landscape of the entire country. Candidates knew if they could capture California, New York, and/or most of the Northeast their chance of winning was a given, the rest of the country got the big ole middle finger. 248836_340

The states who got the Liberal middle finger, populated by hard working, taxpaying, law-abiding citizens (the backbone of this country), whose voices have been ignored since Reagan left office, finally had had enough and turned out to vote.

Two of the states the left always catered to, New York and California have an illegal immigrant population of 3,125,000. How many of those cast votes, illegally, the 2016 presidential election? Everyone that could I’m sure.

Illegal immigrants, who are being supported by taxpayers from 45 other states which had have no say in the matter! Where was our Electoral College in this?

We have a joke of a health-care system, passed by a political minority, which illegal immigrants are benefiting from at no cost to them, while middle-class insurance premiums have doubled or tripled since the ACA became law. No Electoral College intervention here.

Obama has run the country for the last 7 1/2 years on a $9 Trillion credit-card shoring up government pension plans and increasing welfare handouts, all while destroying middle-class America.

We are $20 Trillion in debt, the middle class is hanging on by a finger nail to what’s left of the American dream, Obama is importing refugees and settling them in states who have no say in the matter, expecting the middle-class taxpayer to not only accept it, but pay for it.

Here is a list of the states where Obama has illegally settled refugees and what is interesting is, Michigan and Pennsylvania, traditional Liberal strongholds, who have had refugees forced on them by Obama, came out and voted for Donald Trump.

We can’t afford to pay our own debts, much less everyone else’s. But again no Electoral College intervention here either.

Working class America, found in Donald Trump a man that recognized the legitimacy of their anger, and had the courage to tell the elitists in Washington we have had enough.

Trump told the media, the Liberal propaganda machine I don’t need you, I will go to the people and win without you,’ the media hated him for it, and attacked him 24/7.

Those who voted for Trump were tired of 2 or 3 states deciding everything for the entire country. For too long California, New York, and the elitists in Washington D.C have violated states’ rights, Constitutional rights, and sought to replace our lifestyle with a lifestyle of their choosing.

I freely admit all states have problems to deal with, but the difference is we in the other 45 states do not dictate to California or the Northeastern states how to live their lives or run their states.

Alabama, where I live, is not an ass-backward, hick state as portrayed by the media. It is a conservative state with hard working people who feel, as a black woman in front of my wife and I, at our voting place expressed so eloquently; “I just want to work, pay my taxes, and be left alone.” Absolutely right.

Our way of life (and I speak for most of the states in this country) is based on faith, family, and country. Our way of life has been under assault by Washington DC, and we are sick of it.

The 2nd amendment exists to secure the right to our way of life. According to Liberals like Obama, we are just “clingers to our bibles and our guns.” Damn right, just like the founders of this country.

We are tired of Liberals trying to replace faith with theoretical nonsense, replace family with government, and replace freedom with socialism. If that’s what you want in your state, in your city, in your lifestyle, fine. But you don’t get to decide that for the rest of us.

Hence the Electoral College. electoral-college

Here’s another news flash for you; the vast majority of gun violence is committed by Liberal welfare recipients, not bible-toting, gun-clinging rednecks in the south. The vast majority of the rioters in major cities are also Liberal welfare recipients or illegal immigrants.

Those same miscreants have declared war against law and order, murdering police officers, destroying private property, all while the Obama administration supports their actions.

This is what Trump supporters saw. This is why Trump won. This time the Electoral College, which has failed me and others so many times in the past, finally came through.

Do I want California to succeed from the Union, or course not? Sarcastically speaking – it would cost too much to build a wall around California, besides I get my wine from there.

While you may be upset with the Electoral College, I think it’s time those of you in California, New York City, and Washington DC realize we in the other 45 states have a say as well.

And our voice came through loud and clear this year.

We will no longer be dictated to by a minority of those who threaten our way of life.


Orlando, Obama, and Reality

In the aftermath of the Orlando terrorist attack, we watched as an angry President Obama addressed the situation.


It wasn’t long before Obama quickly went on the attack and found scapegoat for the events in Orlando in one Donald Trump.

In the same un-presidential rant he took the opportunity to bring gun-control rights into the address. An agenda item which he has tried to check off his bucket list since early in his presidency, when the Democrats lost control of the House.

However it was completely obvious to everyone, except died-in-the-wool, hardcore liberals, his anger was misplaced.

Understandably, he was upset about another terrorist attack on American soil under his watch, but there are other factors which need to be considered that triggered such a rant.

His anger could have been triggered, by the confronted reality which shattered a long-held fantasy; that Islam is undeniably linked to terrorism and terrorism is undeniably linked to Islam. This reality hit Obama hard, for the Orlando victims were not just any victims, they were all from the LBGT community, a group for which Obama has shown much empathy for, and they were gunned-down by an Islamic terrorist.

It is quite possible this was the event, the moment, which shattered the illusion of the peaceful nation of Islam somehow would acquiesce to America and alter their views on homosexuality.

Obama has long thought Islam and America could all just get-along; Somehow Islam to Obama was a religion of peace, only hijacked by a few nuts who have perverted the faith. What he failed to realize is in the Islamic world there is no separation between church and state, and both operate under sharia law, which no Muslim was or is interested in altering.

Somehow Obama thought because he was able to manipulate American values and change the laws to accommodate 3% of the population at the expense of acceptance by the other 97%, that he would be able to get Muslims to change Sharia law to aqueous to America, LBGT community and all. The terrorist attack by a confessed Muslim on his beloved LBGT community was just too much to rationalize, so the rant.

Proof of this is revealed in the rant itself. First he goes after Trump, the first scapegoat that came to mind. Why, because Trump’s view to temporary ban Muslim immigration, in light of the increasing number of terrorist attacks at home, was validated by the Orlando massacre. Trump was right, again, and Obama was wrong.

Part of the rant was a rebuttal, or defense, of Obama’s continual refusal to use the term “Islamic-Terrorism” and his insistence on referring to ISIS as ISIL, saying changing the name is not going to make it go away. While that is true within the confines of the statement, it does describe a direct link between terrorism and Islam, which Obama is unwilling to accept. There are certain types of people who cannot accept criticism and cannot admit being wrong without lashing out in anger, especially if the criticism, and being proved wrong, is in public.

Narcissistic people like Obama are this type of personality.

And while Obama claims “changing the name is not going to make it go away,” he is perfectly willing to freely use the term “Assault-Rifle” in these types of attacks, when in fact the gun used in the Orlando Night Club attack was not an assault rifle. The media picked up the assault rifle term and attached it to being an AR-15, which was incorrect as well.

The long and short of this tragedy, was it was directly due to the mental perceptions of Islam by Obama reflected in his fanciful policies regarding Islam. It remains to be seen how this crushed fantasy will affect Obama in the remainder of his Presidency.



Is Barrack Obama Today’s Jim Jones?

It has often been said “history repeats itself. “ And some who shape history are masters of deception.

Those of us old enough to remember The Guyana Tragedy remember two things; the name of the leader who convinced several hundred people to poison their children then commit suicide; Jim Jones.

And the question we continue to ask ourselves; “how could those people believe in this man so much they would rather kill their children and themselves than admit they had been deceived?”

But this kind of deception, this level of blind devotion, is still happening today. With the know-everything-about-everything-in-an-instant Internet and Social Media, one would think it impossible for people like Jim Jones to pull off that kind of deception today.

The fact is, the downturn in people’s ability to think for themselves is in direct proportion to the rise of the believability of almost anything posted on the Internet or Social Media.

People don’t think, and they don’t remember. What’s the point when you can just Google it?

If it’s on Facebook, Twitter, or the internet, it must be true, right? Isn’t that what so many believe? If it’s not the case, how come the stories themselves, or links to the stories, are re-sent faster than fire spreads in dry brush?

The rush to judgment, based on an online article, a tweet, or instant message, shows the absolute possibility large numbers of people can be deceived quickly and completely.

Deceived only for a short time, in some cases for a long time, and maybe even a lifetime. But still deceived. Even in the ‘golden age’ of information.

This is especially true in politics. Today’s politician knows truth is subjective, because of that lack of discernment by the voting public at large. No matter how big the lie they use is, it works, for the attention span of adults today can be compared to that of a gnat.

If they discover it’s a lie, they complain, but quickly move on to the next new thing online, never realizing they are losing their ability to think for themselves, much less engage in any form of rationalization.

Jumping from one headline to another on the internet is commonplace. It used to be called surfing the net. What’s it’s called today is anyone’s guess, but if the trending reports are any indication, those cruising the internet are becoming mental zombies.

If there are no attention grabbing headlines, then today’s politicians are all too ready to create them for you. This is referred to as straw men; created arguments based on partial truths or outright lies. Like the ‘war on women,’ etc. And how does the public react to these created issues? Like moths to a front porch light at night.

There is a deeper seated and more dangerous form of deception being practiced today creating followers who are deceived for a lifetime. Their deception is so entrenched they refuse to listen to anything that contradicts their beliefs, no matter how factual the proof is against what they hold as truth.

They are true believers in the cause.

Those unable or unwilling to come to grips with the fact they’ve been tricked? They were lied to, and they fell for it hook, line, and sinker.

You would be astounded to know how many willfully continue to believe a lie, or liar, rather than admit they’d been had. Call them foolish, delusional, brain-dead, or whatever it doesn’t change that fact.

Many people are willing to continue to believe and support a lie rather than admit they were wrong. Ego is a powerful two-edged sword.

How do these types of deceptions happen, and how do they begin? You need a central character, a Jim Jones.

A man of questionable beginnings, with a delusional mother, Jones came on the scene without much notice.  After building a religious and social network that could be used to further his cause, all that was needed was to get his foot in the door of the political arena.

Jones got his foot in the door by receiving an appointment to a local Human Rights Commission by a mayor. It didn’t take long for the radical to find a cause and a voice.

Jones’s radical cause would quickly rise garnering national attention. In a span of 18 years, Jim Jones went from his initial obscure post in politics to the Guyana tragedy. He went from a sparse following, to deceiving thousands, and ultimately led over 900 lives to their death.

Jones’s rise and fall, his deception of thousands culminating in a mass murder/suicide took place long before the internet existed. Well before Social Media or cell phones. How much faster would his rise and his follower’s demise happen in today’s world of instant and constant onslaught of information?

Jones’s beliefs found their roots in communist literature (like The Communist Manifesto) and by studying histories of men whose lives began in glory, yet culminated in deception and the ultimate deaths of their followers (like Hitler and Stalin). And Jones, like Hitler and Stalin dealt with those who refused to believe or follow without question harshly.

With Hitler and Stalin people were faced with 2 choices; follow or become victims of the cause, which usually meant paying with their life. History records the millions who were assassinated by ruthless dictators.

Jones, and deceivers that followed in his steps, realized there was no need of real assassination. They discovered character assassination was just as effective as a means to an end as was real assassination.

And he was right.  Today’s deceivers who follow in Jones’s footsteps, know ego and character assassination are just as effective as a bullet.

If you don’t think so, ask yourself this; how many people worry more about what people think of them online than the truth? Far too many.

Ironically, in many historical accounts Jim Jones is referred to as an “American cult leader and community organizer.”

Does any of this sound like I could be describing someone in a position of political power today? It should, and it’s not by accident.

The parallels between Jones’s meteoric rise to cult leader, and the rapid political success of Barrack Obama are, at the very least, uncanny. The shared similarities in their lives from childhood to college demand more than a casual look.

I will not go into all of the details of Jim Jones’s rise to Cult Hero status and the Guyana tragedy, for they can readily be found. I would encourage you to do a little research and consider the commonalities their lives share beyond those I mention here.

And the center-point of this article?

Barrack Obama is the Jim Jones of Democratic Party. He is the quintessential “American cult leader and community organizer.” And his followers are committing suicide. Barrack Obama has deceived the Democrats into killing their own party and ultimately destroying their own lives, just assuredly as a drunk or a drug addict works to his own destruction.

Does that statement shock you? I hope so.

The Democratic party of today is not the Democratic party of yesteryear. There are no more ‘blue-dog’ democrats. No more unshakable support for the working man.

Those democrats have been replaced by rabid progressives who only seek to replace the greatest system of government the world has ever known with a failed communistic system. A communistic system that has failed in every nation which it has been instituted.

Obama and the Progressives will destroy anyone who gets in their way by character assassination.

Let me draw your attention to a few parallels comparing the beginnings and lives of Jim Jones and Barrack Obama:

1.    Jim Jones was born to a delusional mother and Barrack Obama born to a miss-guided hippie. Both had a disdain, if not outright hatred of America.

2.    Neither Jones’s nor Obama’s father had any positive influence on their lives as children.

3.    Both Jones and Obama used ties to religious organizations in their young adult lives to further their political careers.

4.    Both severed ties to those religious organizations once they obtained a following of their own.

5.    Both held political views based in communism (Socialism is simply a watered-down version of Communism).

6.    Both shared a dislike, if not outright hatred of, white people. Even though both men were of Caucasian decent, they were racially against anything white.

7.    Both attended colleges and both received degrees. Since verification of their educational records are locked away, we can offer nothing of details other then what they received a degree in.

8.    Once their political careers seemed to have a solid footing they became all the more radical and outspoken. Even changing there positions on key matters.

9.    Both were excellent orators using their verbal skills to deceive others into believing they were leading them to the Promised Land.

10.  Neither would or could take criticism in any form, and would use the criticism as an opportunity to attack others.

11.  Both infiltrated already established public and political organizations, then twisted their charters to further their own designs.

Am I saying Barrack Obama will lead people to suicide like Jim Jones? Yes. It will be in a different form, but the end result will be almost the same.

Jim Jones founded his own religion, demanded of his followers strict obedience to the cause, convincing them what he was doing was for them. It was in their best interest. Very few escaped his bewitchment. Most stayed on, either refusing to believe the truth or so humiliated by the realization of throwing their lives away in pursuit of a lie, refused to leave.

Perhaps Jim Jones would have been able to destroy lives on a national scale if he had the internet and social media at his disposal, but thankfully he didn’t. Unable to increase his following and in the face of mounting criticism, he decided to flee with his followers to a place where they could live in his bent form of paradise.

Jones’s followers willingly went from civilization to a life of abstract poverty in the wilderness, and they took their children with them!

It is easier to deceive people today than in Jones’s day. Just look around and watch. Listen to what others consider important while you’re at the coffee shop or lunch.

Look at the top internet searches on any of the major search engines, or what’s trending on Facebook or Twitter. Look at the explosion of reality television. Reality television is anything but real, but the ratings those shows receive are all too real.

Barrack Obama has no desire to flee like Jones. He is all in, because deception is all he’s got. He thinks he has the tools and the talent to create his own form of paradise here in America. And he is off to a tremendous start. He has accomplished a great deal of change in a short amount of time.

How did he do it? Just a few radical, yet simple, steps.

Step one; (now that he’s in the national spotlight and in a place of political power), he created a loyal following. Created it by deception and coercion. Those who couldn’t be converted were coerced.

It’s easier to coerce people today than you might imagine. Having a fear of being found out or of being humiliated in public will lead people to lie, even break the law to maintain their public appearance.

This fear is multiplied in politicians, public perception is everything, especially now where secrets can be revealed quickly and publically on the internet, has caused many politicians to do nothing rather than risk public discretion.

Obama and the progressives know this; coercion all too easy. If you can’t take a man’s life, you ruin a man’s life. If you ruin the man’s life, you ruin the man. There is no need to list the names of victims of this administration. But there are many.

Step two; destroy your own party leaving the current members 2 choices; get on board or get run over. What do you think most politicians choose to do? Just look at the last 6 years for your answer.

The really slick part of this is building your inner circle, your most trusted, your henchmen, of people who can be easily coerced themselves because they are of such low character.

Why destroy your own party? Why not just start your own? Starting in a well-established party is the way to go. It’s far easier to change a large existing party than venture out on your own. Brand loyalty is a huge plus. Most vote along party lines, so it is far more advantageous to be the candidate of the established party.

Once you’re in, you’re in. Instant following by virtue of brand loyalty. Then the deception starts. Slowly at first, then radically, once your followers realize they either follow or commit political suicide.

Today’s Democratic Party barely resembles the party of 10 years ago, and has no resemblance to the Democratic Party 25 years ago. The shift has been so far to the left, towards greater and greater government control, the current party can be referred to Democrat in name only.

This shift has moved so far left, it has effectively dragged the Republicans (the right) to the center, until they now resemble ‘blue-dog’ Democrats of days past.

This shift has created a new political party and given new life to an existing one. The Tea Party is that creation, and the progressives are scared to death of them. The Tea Party was born out the dissatisfaction of the Republican Party’s shift to the middle, they considered it a desertion of conservative principles that would not be tolerated.

The Independent party is given new life. The Independent party has seen substantial growth over the last 5 years, largely comprised of Democrats who realize their own party has gone off the deep end.

Republicans and Democrats have taken notice of this growth and focus 90% of their campaign efforts on swaying this Independent political demographic.

Step three; destroy any chance of return to a previous way of doing things and former political ideology. This is accomplished two-fold; destroy personal and national wealth, and destruction of the middle-class. Once this is accomplished, two choices will remain; total reliance on the government or poverty beyond anything they are used to.

Barack Obama is already on step 3 and is succeeding in this two-fold part of step 3. He is running the National debt to levels that will soon be unpayable.

When the United States cannot repay its debt, it will become isolated from the world, traveling down a road to its own Guyana, to self-destruction.

This Progressive cult leader will encourage by deception, then watch while his followers commit financial suicide.

Did Obama inherit a National Debt of $6 trillion? Yes he did ($5 Trillion in actual and another $1 Trillion from ongoing government outlays), but part of the rapid rise of National Debt under Bush can be attributed to 9/11, hurricane Katrina, and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. (I am not making excuses for Mr. Bush, just stating facts).

The National Debt is now $18 Trillion and will be close to $25 Trillion by the time the next president is a year into their first term. What has the Obama Administration spent $12 Trillion on?

He’s had no 9/11. No Katrina. There has been no major investments in infrastructure.

The money went to capital cronyism at historical levels and an unheard of expansion of government welfare. Obama’s spending spree went unchecked because Harry Reid was coerced into sitting on his hands and watching it happen.

Expansion of government welfare at unprecedented levels and a lower percentage of workforce participation since the 70’s is what we have as a result of the current policies. Tax revenues are at an all-time high, yet we are still spending more than ever.

The second part of the plan is the destruction of the middle-class. For all the proclaiming of fighting for the middle-class and the posturing as its savior, Barack Obama is destroying the middle-class, driving them to poverty.

The middle class is largely comprised of self-made, self-reliant people. Those who love God, family, and country. People who believe government is a necessary evil, not a welcome dictator of their lives. They know government was never intended to be a wet nurse to the lazy.

The middle-class, the backbone of America is being destroyed by Obama and the Progressive movement. In the Progressive world there is no place for self-made or self-reliant people. Only obedience, only government, only rich and poor, with no middle. The rich are the government, and the poor are forced to rely on it.

Once the followers of Obama realize what has happened to them, faced with the inability to cope with the 2 choices left to them, they will surrender to government control of their lives (committing ideological suicide) or live in poverty under constant scrutiny of the government. In either event they will have committed individual suicide, becoming nothing more than drones.

That’s the way deceivers of the world work. They don’t kill you; they get you to commit suicide. They succeed because you fail. Fail to be your own person. Fail to realize that public opinion is a worthless commodity.

If you abandon reason, then you are in danger of self-destruction, and Barrack Obama is there to lead you forward……to it.

It my hope this article makes you angry, angry enough to think for yourself. Angry enough to save yourself.




National Public Radio or National Progressive Tadio

Being the open minded Conservative that I am, I listen to NPR daily. I am fully aware NPR is a left leaning radio enterprise, and have no illusions of them being anything but liberal. However I’m convinced it never hurts to get a different perspective on things; in fact it’s healthy to hear views that differ from your own. It keeps you from being close-minded.

I enjoy the music, the shows, and some of the stories they broadcast, I can easily cope with their global warming dribble, but I cannot help but notice NPR has become more left-leaning than in times past. Their stories even border on free advertising for candidates and causes of their choice.

Just a couple of stories to prove my point; on 7/29 there was as story about the coming battle for the Senate seat in Georgia .

Instead of focusing equally on both candidates, the story was a glowing endorsement for Michelle Nunn, the daughter of the well-known Sam Nunn former Senator from the state of Ga. This is Nunn’s first run at public office, and other than being the daughter of a former Senator, what qualifications does Ms. Nunn possess that would make her a good representative of the people of Georgia?

Qualifications (or lack there of) mattered little to NPR, Nunn is a liberal democrat, NPR is a left leaning organization, so maybe NPR felt ‘obligated’ give Ms. Nunn some free advertisement – a glowing story – on national radio. What better way to skirt the limits one can contribute to a political campaign than free publicity?

Exactly how much does advertising on the radio on a national scale cost? According to Cabrillo.edu  “National Radio cost is $5,000-10,000 per 60 seconds.” So if a particular candidate is in NPR’s good graces (shares the same political views), and NPR does a 5 minute story on their campaign, that turns out to be a $50,000 campaign donation the candidate doesn’t have to list on the contribution ledger. If NPR decides to do several stories on the same person, the value of the publicity becomes obvious.

The real story in this particular Senate race is the Tea-Party candidate David Perdue. NPR blew past this fact in their story, only mentioning David Perdue as surviving a ‘bruising’ primary race. It was a ‘bruising’ primary between the Republican establishment and a Tea Party candidate. Tea Party candidates are gaining ground on the right side of the isle, even though Harry Reid said “the Tea Party is dead.

The format is always the same with NPR; the reporter begins the story, or interview, bashing the right – then goes into the rest of the story justifying the liberal position for some 10 minutes or so. “That crazy Tea Party guy going up against the morally superior Ms. Nunn who stands for social justice and the right way to do things” seems to be the theme here.

People are tired of politics as usual, on both sides of the Isle, and the Tea Party is offering new-comers, who seem to be interested in fixing things, not just offering lip service. That is the real story of this Senate race in Georgia. David Perdue, an experienced businessman fought through the bruising primary, while Michelle Nunn road her father’s name to a cozy post in a non-profit organization – in short a high class community organizer.

Nunn, an unknown liberal, and unsoiled by the last 6 years of Obama, going against a Tea Party candidate, is the real story here. But NPR focuses on Nunn more than the contest. It’s already been established how much money this much advertising would have cost the Nunn campaign if they had to purchase the time. NPR gave it to the Nunn campaign for free. That’s the reason I don’t donate to NPR. They operate in the interest of the Progressive Movement not the ‘public.’

One would think NPR (National Public Radio) would give both sides, both parties equal time, equal grace, and a neutral opinion, but such is not the case. One would think National Public Radio would represent equally the opinions of the ‘public.’ But alas National Progressive Radio seems to be a more accurate definition of NPR than does National Public Radio.

My second example is the story on Hillary Clinton’s book tour  by Mara Liasson. You’ve probably seen Ms. Liasson on Fox News, appearing to be middle of the road (fair and balanced) but a liberal to the core. As was her puff-piece on the Clinton book tour.
Puff-piece is a fair description of Ms. Clinton’s failed book tour. Hillary’s book sales were around 85,000 in the first week of release (#1 on the NYT best seller list), then nose-dived to 48,000 the 2nd week. That sounds like crash and burn to me. Hell, I saw the book on sale at Sam’s Wholesale club two weeks ago (a month after the initial release). This book’s appeal sank faster than the Titanic.

Does anyone but the staff at NPR think Hillary’s book was the huge success it was being portrayed as in this story? No. But again National Progressive Radio gave Ms. Clinton a glowing review, even highlighting the books title “Hard Choices,” as indicative of what a great President, albeit a poor candidate, she would make.

I began laughing out loud at this point in the story, wondering if any of those ‘hard choices’ had anything to do with choosing the YouTube video to blame Benghazi on.

Maybe it was supporting the $70,000 apology campaign video put together by the Obama Administration. Maybe one of those ‘hard choices’ was the failure to address any questions about her claim of being broke, yet her and Bill collecting millions of dollars in speaking engagement fees.

The Clinton book tour is a flop. You can paint it any color you want, but a flop is a flop, no matter what color. I bet the publisher is currently worried if they will even make enough from book sales to cover the advance they paid Ms. Clinton.

Back to the point; NPR is all too ready to do puff pieces on Liberal candidates, thereby giving them tens of thousands of dollars of free national advertising, while the stories done on Conservatives are short and full of snide implications. If the Tea Party is mentioned at all it is done in a derogatory fashion.

There are links to the stories sited in the article, listen for yourself. Then decide for yourself. I could site several stories weekly, but you get the point.

Take your pick – National Progressive Radio or National Public Radio. Enjoy yourself while listening, just be aware their programming (except for the music) is liberal through and through.


The Flexibility Or Weakness of Obama

Remember this?


This little agreement between President Obama and Vladimir Putin (March 2012) yielded this result a short year later (3/15/2013). Newly elected president Obama pulled the plug on the 4th phase of a missile defense system in Poland.

This was not the first time Obama had canceled missile defense deployment in Europe; the first time was in 2009, during his first year as President.

The first year of both terms the president took the liberty of weakening Europe’s missile defenses. Each time these cancelations took place with little fan-fair, but this time with consequences.

Was the Russian encroachment into Crimea part of the deal that Obama indicated he ‘would have more flexibility’ in? Or was it yet another foreign policy weakness of this administration exposed? Or was it both?

In either event, people’s lives are at risk, and those lives are at risk, in part anyway, because this administration has failed.

So when you hear Obama say this


Do you believe him? Do you think the Russians believe him? Do you think anyone on the world stage believes him?

I doubt it.

Since the primary function of the commander in chief is to protect this nation against any and all enemies, how safe do you feel? It’s one thing to support a president that hands out domestic freebies to his constituents, it’s quite another to support a president who is putting our national security, your life, at risk.


Europe has lost the missile shield; Russia has Edwin Snowden, and will soon install a puppet government in Crimea, all because of the flexibility of this president.

What security have we already lost, and how much more will we lose in the future?

It wasn’t too many years ago that a very popular, and flexible Bill Clinton had the opportunity to collect Osama Bin Laden from a country willing to hand him over.

Clinton ignored the opportunity, perhaps too busy enjoying his domestic popularity and Bin Laden disappeared.

Of course that little mistake culminated in 9/11. 9/11, a day that would mark history with the largest single day loss of American life, eclipsing the loss of American life at Pearl Harbor.

What will the ‘flexibility’ or weakness of this president hold in store for our future security, or lack thereof?