What Happened…………………..in Alabama

Now that the special election is over and the vote certified, it’s time to take a look back and see how Democrat Doug Jones was elected. There were three major factors which determined the outcome.

But before we discuss what this election was, let’s discuss what it wasn’t.

It wasn’t an indication of Alabamians displeasure with Trump.

It wasn’t a repudiation of Trump’s policies.

It wasn’t a message to the GOP.

It wasn’t a democratic comeback, a ‘shocker,’ ‘tsunami,’ ‘bombshell,’ or any other adjective the Liberal media chooses in describing Doug Jones’s victory.

What it was – what happened in Alabama, was dirty, liberal politics, carefully orchestrated by career politicians, or should I say government plantation owners, in Washington D.C.

Liberal leadership knows by its very political nature, and practices; “he who pays is boss, and he who receives owes.” 1
A concept Conservatives can’t seem to grasp the fundamental importance of. The Conservative mindset ignores this reality because they don’t live in perpetual debt to the government, and assumes, to their own demise, no one else would want to either. How wrong they are.

Liberals chose to go all in in Alabama because they saw a chance to defeat a weak Republican candidate in Roy Moore. Moore’s weakness was amplified at the hand of fellow Republicans. Had Mitch McConnell kept his mouth shut, and Luther Strange emerged as the Republican candidate to replace Jeff Sessions, Doug Jones wouldn’t have stood a chance, and the Liberals wouldn’t have wasted $12 Million on an election good only until November 2018.

But we all witnessed the outcome of that blunder by the GOP. It seemed the GOP couldn’t help themselves, they just had to continue to screw things up by helping. Mitch McConnell’s influence, a terrible candidate in Roy Moore, brandishing a pistol at a campaign rally and riding a horse to the polling place resulted in a total failure endorsing a total clown.

The coup d’état came at the hand, or mouth of, Senator Richard Shelby encouraging Republicans to write in a candidate rather than voting for Moore – what the hell were you thinking? That act of stupidity created an amount of write-ins almost equal to the spread between the two candidates.

A relatively new activity did come into play in the Alabama special election, and in essence may be a trial balloon, measuring potential for use in future elections nationwide. It was overlooked by most, but it was the first time I recall seeing the Washington DC media directly attacking a candidate in a state election using a story without local origin.

Most derogatory news stories about candidates originate in the state or local of the candidate, then progress to the national stage. Not so with candidate Roy Moore. The attack on Roy Moore came straight from one of the swamp’s mouthpieces – The Washington Post.

It was a brilliant plan. Riding the wave of the popularity of the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse accusations, the Democrats found a way to level the same charges against an unsuspecting Roy Moore. His accusers didn’t go to any local news outlet that I’m aware of, to tell their story of sexual abuse at the hand of Roy Moore. No it went to and came directly from Washington. The Swamp.

Ironic isn’t it: the willful, two-faced lifestyles of Liberals. Harvey Weinstein, beloved Democrat, and staunch Hillary Clinton supporter, is just one of dozens of liberal party sexual degenerates whose sexual activities are overlooked, or flat out given a pass as long as they are party loyal and have some use. It would be redundant to list the names of whom I am referring to, for you know who they are.

The Democrats employed, as I mentioned in my last article, Gloria Allred to ensure Moore’s accusers would get to tell their story on the national stage.
Are their accusations true? At this point, we do not know, true or not, their accusations have already served their purpose. Roy Moore, in the eyes of enough voters in Alabama, thought he was just another Harvey Weinstein. Their 40 year old accusations against Moore cannot be proved or disproved; perfect ammunition against a weak candidate at the right time.

The second thing that happened in securing a Doug Jones victory was motivating the black vote. The responsibility of this ‘get-out-the-black-vote’ effort fell to Congresswoman Terry Sewell. Alabama’s 7th District’s representative, my representative.

Terry Sewell, a congresswoman who ignorantly stated while campaigning ‘healthcare was a right,’ secured her current seat in congress by 2 qualifications: 1, she’s a well-spoken black woman in a minority district, and 2, she was Michelle Obama’s college roommate.

She would be assisted in her efforts by $12 Million in Democratic campaign funding, most of which came from an org (hiway31.org) which by law doesn’t have to disclose its donors names until well after the election, a well-known local black celebrity in Charles Barkley, and a black senator from New Jersey, Cory Booker.

Charles Barkley is a true attention whore, who plays both sides of the fence when it comes to black politics, but is much admired by the black community and therefore influential when it comes to swaying the black vote.

Cory Booker, is just a plain political whore, who puts out exactly what and when the swamp tells him to put out. It was nauseating listening to Booker stump for Jones, babbling on about his ties to Alabama, and what he personally owed to Alabama, all of which was nonsense, but the target audience ate it up.

Congresswoman Terry Sewell assumed her role as job boss, making sure the blacks on the government plantation voted for the party who ‘pays,’ and reminded them who they ‘owe.’ They owe the political party or any politician who will protect their government subsidies. She did her job well. Doug Jones secured 98% of the black female vote and 93% of the black male vote.
In short; the second deciding factor in the outcome of the Alabama special election was the expansion, and whip cracking of the members of the government plantation.

Least you think this is exaggeration on my part, it may interest you to know as of 2017 there are more than 800,000 Alabamians receiving some form government benefits. So you tell me how likely it is the slaves on the government plantation, will voluntarily get off the government dole.

And yes, I’m well aware white people are on the government’s plantation. But as any good accountant will tell you it’s the percentages, not the numbers you need to be concerned about.

Meanwhile the white voters (and the remaining black voters) were undecided in their vote. Alabamians still being largely religious were torn between the accusations against Moore and their religious beliefs, creating a crisis of conscience. What good Christian wouldn’t be concerned about voting for an adult married man possibly guilty of making unwanted sexual advances towards teen age girls?

So there you have it.

What happened in Alabama?

1st. Dirty politics orchestrated directly from Washington. A trend that I think will continue in the future. Think of it as a political violation of states’ rights by federal media intervention.

2nd. A terrible GOP candidate.

3rd. And effective motivation of the government slave population by reminding them “he who pays is boss, and he who receives owes.”

There are those Liberals who will say I cannot prove my conclusions, even though I think they are fairly self-evident. To them, I will use one of their favorite defenses in response: “you cannot disprove them either.”

 

1 Colonel Boris Yakovlevich Bukov (a soviet spy in the U.S. from 1937 – 1939)

Political sex-slinging in Alabama

 

Since Alabama has garnered national attention over the Dec 12th special election, and since Roy Moore has already been convicted in the court of public opinion, I thought as a resident of the great state of Alabama I would give you a report from inside the state.

First, let’s back up a little and follow the timeline, the players, and the plan.

Summertime 2017, its primary season.

Mo Brooks, Luther Strange and Roy Moore are battling to be the Republican nominee for the special election on Dec 12th to fill the senate seat Jeff Sessions vacated when he became attorney general.

The 3 choices:

Mo Brooks – who cares he wasn’t going to win.

Luther Strange – a good guy and probably would be pretty good senator for the people of Alabama and current temporary fill in for Sessions. But a little too establishment. You know a good ole boy.

Roy Moore – Quite a character. Radical would be an understatement. Moore is well respected in this state for his stance against Gay marriage and his fight to keep the 10 commandments in the court room, which cost him his judgeship. A major anti-swamper.

As expected Mo Brooks was blown out in the 3 way run off, then there were 2.

A runoff that should have gone to Luther Strange. And probably would have, but then came the McConnell Trump endorsement. That turned out to be the kiss of death for Luther. Not because of President Trump but because of McConnell.

Mitch McConnell is the swamp, he is hated, and I mean hated, by every conservative in Alabama.

The fact that Moore beat Strange in the run-off is proof there is a real movement behind the drain the swamp slogan. If McConnell had kept his mouth shut Luther would have won the primary. But Ole Mitch can’t help it, he is clueless. The liberals have out smarted Mitch again.  Status quo for the last 10 or 12 years. He can’t even win with a majority in both houses of Congress and Trump in the White house.

He’s a loser and we don’t take kindly to losing in this state, which is another reason Mitch is so despised by Alabamians.

So now it’s down to Radical Roy Moore and Doug Jones on the democratic side. Who the hell is Doug Jones anyway? But before we get to that here’s what happened next.

Chelsea Clinton began endorsing Doug Jones on Twitter under the #AlSen hashtag. Why? She’s not an elected official, but she is a Clinton.

Well one can only assume the liberal powers-that-be decided it was time for Chelsea to do something to earn that over a million dollar a year salary other than just being a Clinton, so she sprang into action.

My personal thoughts were; ‘butt out Chelsea, you don’t live here.’

It soon became obvious Chelsea’s endorsement was worthless, and rightfully so.

So the Lib’s needed to change tactics. They would attack Roy Moore’s background. It’s an old but effective tactic. The point of attack to use is the one that’s currently popular in the news cycle.

Guess what that is.

Since the Weinstein allegations were big news, and ‘sexually abused women’ were coming out in droves the weapon of choice was naturally allegations of sexual abuse.

The plan; use the same weapon to defeat Roy Moore. The story broke in the Washington post, and Roy Moore was convicted in the court of public opinion. All too easy.

Follow along here. First it was the Chelsea endorsement, which failed, then the Washington Post article.

Which begs the question; who fed the story to the Washington Post?

Am I defending Roy Moore? No, I don’t know if he’s guilty or not, and neither do you. But I do believe a man is innocent until proven guilty. I also know accusations are not facts. And accusations from someone about something that happened over 30 years ago are extremely suspect.

The planned attack from the democrats was instantly effective since sexual allegations were in the news cycle, Roy Moore is a man, he’s white, and he’s a republican. Guilty as accused.

Enter Gloria Allred, the pathetic legal leech whose schict is male character assassination. Dig up a female victim, or several victims, construct a biased (or BS)  story and parade this whole act through the court of public opinion, hoping to walk away with a sack full of money (where she and the victim split the cash, her percentage being higher than the victim’s because she so earned it).

Which raises another important question: who is paying for Gloria’s services? She’s not going to collect any money from her collection of clients; they don’t have the kind of money her fees call for. Even if this goes to court and she wins, it could be years before she sees a dime.

Someone is paying Gloria Allred right now, and it needs to be revealed who that is. The Democratic Party is- that is my accusation.

Who are Moore’s accusers? In in the grand scheme of things, it doesn’t matter. Not to belittle them, but once this election is over, and if Doug Jones wins, Gloria Allred and the Democrats will drop them like a hot rock and their usefulness will have ended.

The attack is working, but Roy Moore will not lay down like most politicians. He will fight to the end. During his fight over the Ten Commandments statue, he had to be physically removed from office and I doubt he has changed. Moore’s stance eventually cost him his job.

How many politicians do you know who risked their careers for their beliefs?

Back to who the hell is Doug Jones anyway? I’m not going to bash Doug Jones, he seems like a normal person. But here is a fact you should be aware of. Doug Jones was a Bill Clinton appointee.

He will be a perfect sock-puppet for the Democrats if he wins in December. The first clue of he being a sock-puppet is in his campaign ad, were he says “healthcare is broken and we need to fix it.” Really? Your party broke it, and now you innocently want to fix it?

So the stage is set. Political sex slinging at its best, and it’s worst.

What’s at stake is a Senate seat which the GOP cannot afford to lose, but it looks like they might thanks to Mitch McConnell and idiots who comprise the jury in the court of public opinion.

 

 

Thoughts of a Mad American Part 1

 

First in the series of thoughts of a mad American has to be:

Why haven’t you repealed Obamacare?

Hey Republican Congressmen and women. What’s the hold up, I mean besides your incompetence?

The ACA was signed into law 3/23/2010, after it was jammed down our throats without 1 single Republican Signature.  The ACA was a Kennedy wet-dream since the 80’s. If you didn’t realize Kennedy money funded Obama’s presidential campaign, then you weren’t paying attention. The  payback to Ole Ted for funding Obama was passing the ACA.

But after a Republican 7 year vow to repeal Obamacare, you have nothing to show for it except in-fighting. You can’t seem to agree on any of the parts of the bill because you have no bill.

Why can’t you get it together? Don’t you realize this single bill could destroy the United States financially? Those on the Obamacare dole are increasing daily as revealed by its growing favorable polling.

In a recent survey some 52% of Americans have a favorable view of Obamacare.

Of course they do, they are the 52% who have almost free – if not totally free healthcare through Obamacare. 85% of Obamacare enrollees receive subsidies to offset the cost of premiums as well as deductibles.

If you couple the 45% of Americans who don’t pay a dime in Federal Income Tax with those people who have pre-existing medical conditions, I’m surprised the percentage isn’t higher.

Even those persons who are on Obamacare cannot afford the out-of-pocket expense (deductible) of $3500 per year for individuals and $7400 per year per family without subsidies. So they bail out of Obamacare until they need medical care, then the just go down the next day and re-enroll, and as if by magic, they are covered.

The problem is the cost of needed government subsidies will reach $660 billion in taxpayer funds this year just to keep Obamacare afloat.

Here’s a little history review of premiums and deductibles since Obamacare became law.

The real question is why haven’t the Republicans repealed the ACA yet?

Why don’t you Republicans already have a replacement bill ready to go?

What the hell have you been doing for the last 7 years?

Maybe you could buy a “Making a plan for Dummies” book and read it in 7 years. 

You have control of the House, the Senate, and a President who is ready, even anxious, to repeal this failure before it implodes and everyone is left without coverage.

Trump was right, when he said it was time to “drain the swamp!” Maybe the ACA has not been repealed because the current Republicans are members of the swamp. Maybe they enjoy government control of 1/6th of the economy the ACA gives the swamp, the political favors it affords, the money to be had, or the votes to be gained.

Either that or they are gutless incompetents!

Why should they care – not one of them is on Obamacare – their healthcare coverage is the best available yet costs them $0.

Since you Republicans have no replacement plan after 7 years, at the very least, repeal Obamacare! You don’t need a plan for that.

Before you say you can’t – yes you can. The ACA was given the green –light by the Supreme Court based on the premise it was a tax.

Taxes can easily be repealed by a simple majority in both houses.

You think killing Obamacare is a heartless approach? No it’s not. What is heartless is  forcing working families to endure  premiums that have doubled in 8 years, to pay for someone else’s lack of health and coverage.

Why should I be forced to pay for maternity coverage when my wife and will never use it?

Why should I be forced to fund other people sex lives in the form of birth control pills, prophylactics, and abortions?

Why should I be forced to pay for healthcare of others who don’t give a damn about their own health?

Private and government safety-nets for healthcare can both exist at the same time. They did in the past.

The claim that everybody pays under Obamacare is just another lie.

There are other simpler ways of funding government sponsored healthcare where everyone truly does pay, but it seems the swamp members don’t want any part of simple or what’s best for working Americans, just what’s best for their remaining in office.

Buying votes with government giveaways.

Dear Republican swamp members repeal Obamacare!

Don’t you understand why Trump was elected over a field of career Republican politicians? Working class Americans were tired of your continual failures and excuses.

No more excuses! Repeal it or be replaced in the next election. Replaced by anyone who is in favor of calling for a Convention of States to forcefully drain the swamp.

 

 

 

Thoughts of a ‘Mad’ American

 

Over the course of the next few articles, I will feature a topic that makes me ‘mad.’ Not mad in the mentally imbalanced sense, but mad in the sense of frustrated anger.

Frustrated anger, the result of being old enough to see the big picture, which comes with age and experience, and fore-sighted enough to realize the end result of our societies current direction.

The Roman Empire disintegrated having gone down the same road which we as a nation are traveling.

I have no illusions of being a one man savior, or having all the answers, but I would like to offer some practical solutions to the problems we face as a nation.

Some may think my suggested solutions are neither practical nor possible, but I ask; is what we are doing currently working?

As a nation, we are heading down the wrong path, and I’m not the only one who sees it. The election of Donald Trump as president is proof-positive I’m not the only ‘mad’ American.

Mad, that our country is the way it is.

Mad that our government is guilty of gross incompetence, and we can’t seem to get rid of those in power, so the incompetence continues.

Mad that we are $20 trillion in debt.

Mad that laws of the land are not being enforced.

Mad that almost no one can afford health insurance while many receive health care that is paid for by those who can’t afford to pay more.

Mad that the news media has degenerated into a 24 hour a day outlet of lies and half-truths, which intentionally twists the facts into mind-numbing trash consumed by an audience who cannot seem to think for themselves.

Mad that this same audience has been ‘educated’ by the most expensive educational system in the world with the poorest results.

Mad there more people on government welfare than there are who actually pay Federal Income taxes, and many of these same adults have nothing to offer their children except the knowledge of how to get and stay on welfare.

My collection of topics will not be all inclusive, but they are topics which I have some ideas on how to change for the better. Practical solutions which would solve some immediate problems and hopefully change the long term outcome.

They will not be chosen in any order of importance, for the topics are all important. If you think I have left out topics you think are important, then I hope it will inspire you to put forth your ideas

If things continue the way they are America will become the next Venezuela, then our democracy will become a dictatorship if we are unable to rid ourselves of the buffoons who currently occupy the Congress.

Is Bill O’Reilly another victim?

 

Bill O’Reilly’s sudden departure from Fox News last week raised a few eyebrows.

Fans of the show where quick to lash out at Fox News for his dismissal, while those on the left cheered the show and Bill’s demise.

I’m not a fan of the O’Reilly Factor, nor do I dislike the show; his show just doesn’t interest me. But there is something else going on here, which happens all-to-often, an injustice.

How does one go from “the most respected news man on television” to unemployed in a matter of weeks?

It seems Bill O’Reilly is yet another victim of a judgmental society which has already made its mind up; Bill O’Reilly is not only accused of sexual harassment, but is guilty as charged. He is not the first, nor will he be the last victim of this pre-condemnation.

I do not know if he is guilty of what he has been accused of, but it is evident the public in general is already convinced he is. There is a certain stigma attached to some accusations, once leveled never seem to go away. They stick to the accused like a tattoo.

You call a person a liar, a thief, or a cheat, and the media audience takes it in stride, but:

Once a man is accused of rape, the deck automatically begins to be stacked against him. Once the public hears the accusation, they either convict him right away in their minds or become high suspicious of the individual. The same can be said for those accused of child abuse, child molestation, child pornography, or sexual harassment; they are guilty until the public’s demand for proof of innocence is met.

When the accusations are later proven to be false, most people say oh well and move on, or their suspicions never completely go away. But it’s too late for the accused, their life, is already damaged, and many times ruined for the remainder of their lives.

Anyone remember Crystal Mangum? She was the stripper who falsely accused 3 Lacrosse players of rape. The public opinion at the time: yes, 3 rich white boys raped this poor defenseless black stripper.

The campus on which this ‘rape’ took place was soon invaded by large groups of people who were convinced these three men were guilty as charged, based on nothing more than an accusation;

On March 29, more than 500 students, faculty members, administrators, and Durham residents marched across Duke—starting at the Marketplace on East Campus and ending more than a mile later at the Duke Chapel on West Campus—a “Take Back the Night” protest that was coincidentally part of a long-planned Sexual Assault Prevention Week on campus.”

The whole story was a lie, it destroyed the lives of 4 innocent college age men and their families, cost millions of dollars in legal fees proving their innocence, and the social injustice handed to them by a prejudgmental society, has not been corrected, even 10 years after the fact.

So what happened to Crystal Mangum? She’s in prison for a murder, convicted of stabbing her boyfriend to death.

What about the thousands of people who knew the Lacrosse players where guilty and said so? Did they collect money to offset the legal expenses? Did they offer apologies to Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty, Dave Evans, or Ryan McFadden? No they simply when on with their lives, leaving the lives of these 4 men in ruins.

Is Bill O’Reilly guilty of sexual harassment as charged? We do not know yet. Let me repeat that – we do not know yet. But the damage is already done. Bill is gone, and will likely never again be on television or radio, his brand permanently damaged.

O’Reilly’s fall from grace came quickly. And the story played out like it has many times in the past.

First, the accusations from Perquita Burgess and a rush to judgment media audience.

Then sponsors began pulling ad money from the show. PC (politically correct) businesses don’t want to offend anyone, in their minds they can’t afford to lose any customer, so they quickly distance themselves from any situation like the Bill O’Reilly case; which makes them as guilty of precondemnation as the general public.

Once that happened, it only reinforced the public’s condemnation of Bill O’Reilly – thinking “he must be guilty, otherwise the sponsors wouldn’t have bailed on him.”

Once the sponsor money was gone, Fox was left with no choice but to replace Bill O’Reilly. Bill O’Reilly’s fall from grace came at the hands of a former part time employee, with unproven accusations.  Perquita Burgess, armed with a high dollar civil rights attorney  who had inside access to television,  proved the fix was in for Bill.

Is Bill O’Reilly guilty of sexual harassment? All we have at this point is accusations, and lame one’s at that.

As a people who live in a country founded on law and order and the premise of ‘innocent until proven guilty,’ we owe it to Mr. O’Reilly to assume he is innocent until proven guilty. Sadly, he has become just another in a long list of innocent people, whose lives were destroyed because someone accused them of the wrong thing.

But one thing is for certain; Bill O’Reilly is a victim of a pre-condemning, Politically Correct society, and you better pray you are not next.

Kudo’s to Sam’s Club

 

Thank you Sam’s Club

Several months back, I wrote a scathing blog about Sam’s club destruction of the self-check out line.

Upon recent visits I was pleasantly surprised to see; Sam’s Club has changed their pointless and redundant policies regarding self-checkout.

Gone is the requirement to move your 10 items from one shopping cart to another just in case you are unable to count to 10.

Gone is the self-checkout assigned cashier who checked your 10 items or less in case you couldn’t count, only to repeat the same inspection by yet another person when you reached the exit.

Now things are as they should be. Self-checkout is working, without help, without interference, without policies designed to annoy instead of helping.

Scan your 10 items or less, pay with your credit card, make your way to the exit. Sweet!

Did my article about my dissatisfaction with the Sam’s Club self-checkout policies have any effect on   their decision to change their policy for the better?

No way of knowing, but seeing the desired change in policy is satisfaction enough.

Being a fair person, I believe in giving credit where credit is due, so; as much as I blasted the previous Sam’s Club policy, I now commend them on the recent changes,  and a win is a win. I’m happy.

Now if I could only make fellow customers understand 10 items or less means 10 items or less.

Recent Protests and the Hypocrisy of the Left

 

Those of us old enough to recall the protests, and protests turned riots of the late 60’s recognize some similarities between then and now, and some concerning differences.

Truth is, most of these protesters don’t understand or don’t even know what they are protesting, blindly rallying behind causes they fail to realize most of today’s protests are based on lies, and started by liars, just like the “Free Speech” movement which began at Berkeley in the 60’s by one Mario Savio.

Mario Savio, the political activist, who became famous for his attack on the way Universities were operated. Savio thought universities had no right to curriculums, and students should be allowed to do, or study whatever they wanted to, simply because they were students.

Savio, obviously, an intelligent man, maybe winding up at Berkley probably about the time he realized his bouncing from campus to campus failed to give purpose to his life. Mario Savio gathered a number of shallow, disillusioned, like-minded followers and with a little help from television, the Free Speech movement was born.

Savio was a fake, and his cause was based on a lie. The famed sit-ins, known as the “Free Speech” movement had little, if anything to do with free speech. At its core, the free speech movement was little more than an excuse used by its participants for refusing to take responsibility for their own lives.

The movement went from sit-ins, to protests, and finally climaxed with the deaths of 4 protesters on the Kent State campus.

Just like Black Lives Matter, founded by a liar in one Shaun King, a white guy masquerading as a black man, and the entire movement is predicated on the lie of ‘Hands Up Don’t Shoot,’ fostered and publicized by the progressive news media.

The lie has been told so often, and so many times, people think it’s the truth. Todays protests that have nothing to do with truth, they are just anger based on lies, expressed in catch phrases uttered by unhappy and untaught people, who cannot accept the truth.

The Women’s march is another example of a protest based on a false premise.

A group of women dressed up in vagina costumes claiming they are being denied freedom of choice. Are they? What choice are they being denied?

They say they want the government out of their vaginas, but they continue to invite them in. What they really want, and won’t publicly admit, is for the government to pay for their abortions and their birth control claiming it’s healthcare.

Birth control is not healthcare, and if you want the government out of your vagina, then pay for your own birth control and your own abortion.  Free birth control products can be obtained at any county health clinic for those who can’t afford them, just as they were before the Affordable Care Act.

If you are too stupid or too lazy to use birth control, what right do you have to demand the government, i.e. the taxpayer, to pay for your abortion?

The lie of the women’s march is exposed; It’s not about women’s rights, it’s about subsidizing their sex life.

The free speech movement can be traced to a disgruntled student, fueled by the media, who’s growth was attributed to gutless compromising by the leadership at Berkley.

Today’s protests are being instigated by politicians, public calls from United States Congressmen and Senators to “go and protest,” and the growth of these protests is fueled directly by a biased media.

What ever happened to ‘call you Senator’ or ‘write your congressman?

What an utter disgrace to civil democracy.

But as all things evolve so these protests have evolved, and as they continue to evolve, they become more radical, more unruly, more lawless, and are putting some very costly future results in motion.

These protests have evolved into mobs having shed any semblance of decency, while taking perversion to a whole new level. So even calling for the murder of law enforcement personnel, which is nothing short of anarchy.

The most dangerous and disturbing difference in today’s protests verses the 60’s and 70’s is the active participation of elected officials.

The hypocrisy of the ‘tolerant’ left is on display in all its deviant glory, illustrating a stark contrast between the public statements of past political leaders “we are a nation of laws,” and today’s “go and protest.”

Elected officials have chosen an ignorant and dangerous thing to do – invoking mob rule. They have opened Pandora’s box unleashing a spirit of blind hatred which will culminate in people dying because of it.

Chuck Schumer has become the Mario Savio of 2017, along with his socialist side-kick Bernie Sanders. They instigated protests against the repeal of Obamacare, by feeding lies to a mob.

Schumer, in his joint statement, calling for rallies and protests, we find:

“The Republican Party’s plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act is in chaos,” Schumer and Sanders said in the letter. “The American people increasingly understand that throwing 20 million people off health insurance, privatizing Medicare, raising prescription drug costs for seniors and doing away with life-and-death patient protection provisions is not acceptable. The overwhelming majority of Americans want to improve the ACA, not destroy it,”

Only thing is not one thing in this statement is true! Not one!

Two elected officials, instead of legislation and working with other members of Congress to reach a solution, have chosen to call for protests.

(a)Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including, but not limited to, the mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, with intent—

(1) to incite a riot; or

(2) to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot; or

(3) to commit any act of violence in furtherance of a riot; or

(4) to aid or abet any person in inciting or participating in or carrying on a riot or committing any act of violence in furtherance of a riot;

Based on their actions, Schumer and Sander’s could and  should be charged with riot incitement, and if convicted, removed from office. Before claiming they are protected under “free speech” as their predecessor Mario Savio claimed, you may be mistaken.

Consider a couple of quotes from the ACLU regarding free speech:

“Is all speech protected?

The First Amendment protects your right to express your opinion, even if it’s unpopular. You may criticize the President, the Congress, or the chief of police without fear of retaliation. But this right doesn’t extend to libel, slander, obscenity, “true threats,” or speech that incites imminent violence or law-breaking.

Can I talk about government overthrow or taking over the streets?

he government can’t stop you from talking generally about ideas or future events. But it may ban speech that’s “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”

Sanders’ and Schumer’s part in provoking protests, turning into riots should be under investigation. Instead of being leaders, and handling things in a civilized manor, on the floor of the Senate, they are encouraging mob rule. Invoking lawlessness, which will evolve into more lawlessness until deadly force is required.

Schumer in his eagerness to ‘open Pandora’s box;‘ got a taste of the consequences of his actions:

The protesters he provoked have turned on him;

When people start dying in these ‘protests,’ Sanders and Schumer will own a share in the responsibility – this is on them. There is culpability for any damage or death as a result of these protests.

It is clear, Progressives care nothing at all about everyday, hardworking middle-class Americans, who’s lives have been disrupted because other radicals wanted to join in the fun of anarchy.

The same Progressives, who for the past eight years spoke of crossing the isle –  working together – when they were in charge, have replaced those phrases with go and protest.

This is the hypocrisy of the left.

 

 

 

What’s Next for Hillary

What’s next for Hillary? 

The race for the presidency is over. Hillary Clinton lost. End of story, or is it?

The significance of Hillary’s loss is far greater than just the losing of an election. Behind the Hillary bid there were major machinations taking place, record amounts of money changing hands, deals being struck, and promises being made.

While there are whisperings of Hillary running again in 2020, that’s not going to happen. Hillary is done.

The groundwork is already being laid for a presidential bid by a new progressive radical in 2020. One can only speculate who that might be, the picture will become clearer once we see who is going to replace the Clintons as the next pay-for-play leader.

At the top of the list? The Obamas. Obama has world-wide personal appeal, he has already shown he is capable of major fund raising, and is extremely likeable, like most con men.

A good choice for fund-raiser-in-chief and he will be easier to manipulate than the Clintons were, a useful tool in the right hands. Ted Kennedy thought so, and he was right.

And right on Que, there is a brand new foundation just opened for business: The Obama Foundation

There will be no come back for Hillary.

What I see next for Hillary is darkly prophetic. She, or someone in her family will die under mysterious circumstances in 2017 or 2018.

Why?

Pay for play. Just like ‘living and dying by the sword’ is a truism, so is ‘living and dying by pay for play.’

Here’s an example of how pay to play works:

“The AP’s review of federal records, regulatory filings and correspondence showed that almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored Clinton’s speeches have actively sought to sway the government”

And those speaking fees amounted to $21 Million in 2 years after her leaving state dept.

In politics there have always been people like the Clintons – deal makers – initiators, which matched up individuals, corporations, or even other countries to political favors, but no one has ever been in the center of so much money for so many potential favors as the Clintons.

The loss to Trump in 2016 is the end for the Clintons as chief clearing house enablers, the money invested in the Clintons, serious money, is gone.

Every political backer (or investor) knows there is a risk of backing a losing political candidate, that’s just part of it. But with the Clintons it went far beyond the typical investing in a candidate and hoping for a positive outcome.

Major money was invested, major promises made, all bet on a supposed sure thing.

Let’s take a brief look at the kind of money we are talking about.

Remember the “we were flat broke when we left the White House” Hillary quote?

She went from broke to having a net worth of $30 million in 2015.

 

In 2015 is was discovered there was something fishy going on with the Clintons and their finances. Something different, money was unaccounted for. Between their income and after spending $13 mil on a 2008 run there is some $50 mil unaccounted for.

Maybe someone wanted their money back after the 2008 loss?

This is just some of the money we know about. Add in The Clinton Foundation’s $2 billion in revenue since it formed in 1998, and you begin to see the enormous amounts of money we are talking about.

But even after the 2008 loss, Bill was still very popular and Hillary could still be of some use. The Clintons could and would prove their worth during her stint as Secretary of State.

She wasn’t given that slot because of Obama, she was put there by her investors.

With that having gone well, it was time to move on to bigger and better returns on investment.

So the investment stakes were raised and the Clintons would be given one more chance to come through – the 2016 Presidential run. But it was not to be.

The money, paid to, donated to, or handed to, the Clinton’s was an “investment,” and these investors lost serious money on the Clinton bid for the presidency.

The money invested in the Clintons was not just American money, it was from foreign countries and foreign governments.

Hillary Clinton and her supporters spent a record $1.2 billion on a losing presidential campaign.

Now that Hillary has lost, she has nothing left to offer.

Millions upon millions invested, and lost. Don’t expect her backers, her investors, to just say oh well. It is reported George Soros lost $1 billion because of Hillary’s loss.

Don’t expect the Clintons to go quietly into that good night either, knowing their wealth is at risk, and that wealth could go just as quickly as it came. The Clintons will resist, and things could get ugly.

While many Americans would love to see the Clinton clan in prison, I’m afraid prison won’t be enough for these Hillary investors.

The behind the scenes puppet masters don’t like ugly, they like quiet, so attempts will be made to muzzle the Clinton push-back. If that fails, then drastic measures will be taken.

A tragic accident or an untimely demise of Hillary of a member of her family is coming.

Oddly every time the Clintons wound up in a potentially serious legal investigation, people wound up dead. No Whitehouse occupant has ever come close to the associate body count the Clintons racked up.

Here are a few of those mysterious deaths:

Who was behind these mysterious deaths? The Clintons? Or their backers?

It happens, and will happen.

My prediction: Someone in the Clinton family will meet an untimely end sometime in 2017 or 2018. The more noise they make the sooner the end will come.

 

The 2016 Presidential Election and the Electoral College

electoral-college I would like to thank an acquaintance of mine in California who was the inspiration for this article.

Historically after the winner of a presidential election was declared, the disappointment of the losing party quickly subsided. The election was over, time to accept the results, make the best of it, and move on.

This year was different. After Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton the intolerance of the left was exposed for all the world to see.

The same Liberals who preach tolerance, all lives matter, demanding the acceptance of all lifestyles and faiths, were lying in the streets crying, rioting, and refusing to accept the results.

But that discussion is for another topic.

After the election was over a long-time acquaintance of mine who lives on the left coast, questioned the legitimacy of the Electoral College on Facebook. His concerns about Donald Trump were undoubtedly shaped by what he had heard constantly by the 24 hr. a day news media which relentlessly attacked Donald Trump.

The media labeled Trump as a racist, a bigot, a homophobe, a woman hater, and a dozen other derogatory things. None of which are true, but that also is for another topic.

Returning to the Electoral College comment; my first thought ‘was welcome to the club.’ Not because I think the Electoral College should be done away with, but because so much of my life has been affected by the Electoral College in the exact opposite manor.

First things first: my friend in California’s position is Hillary won the popular vote so the Electoral College results should be voided. That we are a democracy, therefore the person with the most votes wins.

But America is a Republic which operates on democratic principles. Big difference. One of the reasons the founders decided each state would have 2 Senators was to preserve equality of representation amongst the states in the enacting of laws which would affect the entire country.

Many would have you believe the Electoral College was created to keep an incompetent from becoming president, but that’s not exactly true. The Electoral College was created to prevent nationwide mob rule by one or a handful of states.

Now let’s look at election results (as of November 12th):

Nationwide popular vote:

Trump 60,072,551

Clinton 60,467,601

A difference of 395,050. A very slim margin of victory.

Now let’s look at 2 statewide results:

California:

Trump 3,021,095

Clinton 5,589,936

A difference of 2,568,841

New York:

Trump 2,640,570

Clinton 4,143,874

A difference of 1,503,304

Now take out the results of either state, New York or California, and Trump wins the popular vote by more than a million. Take them both out and Trump wins the popular vote in a landslide.

My California friend, in anger only I’m sure, echoed the notion of succession from the union, and he wasn’t alone. Wow! Talk about the shoe being on the other foot. Sounds just like the south prior to the Civil war.

Why would they say that? Because they feel Trump is a threat to their way of life. Just like the southern states did prior to the civil war.

It has been taught (by Liberal teachers) for decades the civil war was all about slavery, but that’s not true. It is also taught everyone in the south either had slaves, or was in favor of slavery, but that’s not true either.

Were the evils of slavery a part of it, without question, but the main issue which provoked succession, was when the Northeastern part of the country, far more densely populated, and with a huge technological advantage, began dictating to the lesser populated southern states, how things would be.

Mob rule. A situation diametrically opposed by the Electoral College.

People in the south felt their states’ rights were being violated and their way of life under assault. It was unacceptable for a couple of Northern states to dictate to them how they should live and what rights they should have.

They felt their way of life threatened, so they succeed from the union.

Now fast forward to the last 50 years, and my previous comment ‘welcome to the club’ and how the Electoral College has failed the rest of us at times.

California and New York City are the centers of television, movie production, and news media headquarters. For the last 50 years or so, Liberals have determined what movies would be made, what television shows would be aired, and what and how news stories would be told, while the rest of the country just had to deal with it.

The Liberals took full advantage of this and attacked, belittled, undermined, and at times outright attacked the way of life of Americans in the other 45 states who disagreed with their views.

The news media was used as a weapon to distort the truth and coheres the population to further the Liberal agenda.  We didn’t have a media and entertainment Electoral College, as it were, for us in the other 45 states. Our opinion didn’t matter

 

News flash: most of the movies coming out of Hollywood are nothing short of trash. The View is a social cesspool, Seinfeld wasn’t that funny, not every show has to have a homosexual in it, and nobody in the south liked Honey Booboo; your polling data was wrong (just like in this year’s presidential race).

Thank heavens for NetFlix and others like it.

Oh, and New York City, you are neither the cultural beacon for the country or a shining example of the American dream. Get over yourself.

And speaking of polling data; it’s easy to get the poll results you want when you get to pick the participants. No one I know, myself included, has ever been asked to participate in any political poll. Polling data was and is fixed, whose truthful representation has become a tool the news-media uses to manipulate public opinion.

For too long, the two most heavily populated states have determined the political landscape of the entire country. Candidates knew if they could capture California, New York, and/or most of the Northeast their chance of winning was a given, the rest of the country got the big ole middle finger. 248836_340

The states who got the Liberal middle finger, populated by hard working, taxpaying, law-abiding citizens (the backbone of this country), whose voices have been ignored since Reagan left office, finally had had enough and turned out to vote.

Two of the states the left always catered to, New York and California have an illegal immigrant population of 3,125,000. How many of those cast votes, illegally, the 2016 presidential election? Everyone that could I’m sure.

Illegal immigrants, who are being supported by taxpayers from 45 other states which had have no say in the matter! Where was our Electoral College in this?

We have a joke of a health-care system, passed by a political minority, which illegal immigrants are benefiting from at no cost to them, while middle-class insurance premiums have doubled or tripled since the ACA became law. No Electoral College intervention here.

Obama has run the country for the last 7 1/2 years on a $9 Trillion credit-card shoring up government pension plans and increasing welfare handouts, all while destroying middle-class America.

We are $20 Trillion in debt, the middle class is hanging on by a finger nail to what’s left of the American dream, Obama is importing refugees and settling them in states who have no say in the matter, expecting the middle-class taxpayer to not only accept it, but pay for it.

Here is a list of the states where Obama has illegally settled refugees and what is interesting is, Michigan and Pennsylvania, traditional Liberal strongholds, who have had refugees forced on them by Obama, came out and voted for Donald Trump.

We can’t afford to pay our own debts, much less everyone else’s. But again no Electoral College intervention here either.

Working class America, found in Donald Trump a man that recognized the legitimacy of their anger, and had the courage to tell the elitists in Washington we have had enough.

Trump told the media, the Liberal propaganda machine I don’t need you, I will go to the people and win without you,’ the media hated him for it, and attacked him 24/7.

Those who voted for Trump were tired of 2 or 3 states deciding everything for the entire country. For too long California, New York, and the elitists in Washington D.C have violated states’ rights, Constitutional rights, and sought to replace our lifestyle with a lifestyle of their choosing.

I freely admit all states have problems to deal with, but the difference is we in the other 45 states do not dictate to California or the Northeastern states how to live their lives or run their states.

Alabama, where I live, is not an ass-backward, hick state as portrayed by the media. It is a conservative state with hard working people who feel, as a black woman in front of my wife and I, at our voting place expressed so eloquently; “I just want to work, pay my taxes, and be left alone.” Absolutely right.

Our way of life (and I speak for most of the states in this country) is based on faith, family, and country. Our way of life has been under assault by Washington DC, and we are sick of it.

The 2nd amendment exists to secure the right to our way of life. According to Liberals like Obama, we are just “clingers to our bibles and our guns.” Damn right, just like the founders of this country.

We are tired of Liberals trying to replace faith with theoretical nonsense, replace family with government, and replace freedom with socialism. If that’s what you want in your state, in your city, in your lifestyle, fine. But you don’t get to decide that for the rest of us.

Hence the Electoral College. electoral-college

Here’s another news flash for you; the vast majority of gun violence is committed by Liberal welfare recipients, not bible-toting, gun-clinging rednecks in the south. The vast majority of the rioters in major cities are also Liberal welfare recipients or illegal immigrants.

Those same miscreants have declared war against law and order, murdering police officers, destroying private property, all while the Obama administration supports their actions.

This is what Trump supporters saw. This is why Trump won. This time the Electoral College, which has failed me and others so many times in the past, finally came through.

Do I want California to succeed from the Union, or course not? Sarcastically speaking – it would cost too much to build a wall around California, besides I get my wine from there.

While you may be upset with the Electoral College, I think it’s time those of you in California, New York City, and Washington DC realize we in the other 45 states have a say as well.

And our voice came through loud and clear this year.

We will no longer be dictated to by a minority of those who threaten our way of life.